Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1983 (2) TMI 257

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... transport company covering this consignment it appeared that the consignment was loaded at Rampur in the State of U.P. 2.. On 15th September, 1982, a show cause notice was served by the Sales Tax Officer, Special Investigation Branch, Agra, upon M/s. Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd., Rampur. According to this show cause notice, the value of the aforesaid consignment of 500 cases of Indian-made foreign liquor was disclosed at Rs. 62,525 and as per the statement of a representative of M/s. Shaw Wallace Co. Ltd. On 10th September, 1981, at the time of a survey made by the sales tax department, the delivery of the consignment had been taken in Rampur itself which created a doubt that the purchase had been made by M/s. Shaw Wallace and Company in t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... relief to the petitioners, the present writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution was filed in this Court. While admitting the writ petition to a fuller hearing, this Court passed an order on 24th September, 1981, on the application made by the petitioners for an interim order directing the respondents to release the goods and the truck seized by them. No conditions were imposed upon the petitioners while passing this order. 4.. Sri V.D. Singh appearing for the petitioners has urged that even assuming for the purpose of this writ petition that the facts mentioned in the notice dated 15th September, 1982, to be correct, the seizure of the goods was without the authority of law. He has urged that even though, on account of the inte .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oods, and the remaining provisions of this section shall mutatis mutandis apply in relation to such seizure." 6.. A perusal of these provisions makes it clear that the power to seize goods is conferred upon an officer authorised in that behalf where either the goods cannot be traced to any bona fide dealer or where it is doubtful if the goods are properly accounted for by any dealer in his accounts, registers or other documents maintained in the course of his business. If these two conditions exist, it would be open to seize the goods and not otherwise. Where, as in the present case, the only allegation contained in the notice given to the petitioners on 15th September, 1982, is that the transaction was one of intra-State sale and the val .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates