2009 (8) TMI 1034

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the demand is time barred as there is no suppression on the part of the respondent with intent to evade payment of duty. 2. The contention of the Revenue is that the respondent deliberately declared the goods in question as betel nuts and wrongfully claimed the benefit of notification whereas actually t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X