Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1993 (7) TMI 318

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 39(T) dated April 2, 1992, bearing chassis No. 374-0059-56409 and engine No. 483 DL 41-547915. The seizure was made on April 5, 1992, at Chichira check-post in the district of Midnapur on the ground that the importation was done in contravention of section 6 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954. The present application is also directed against the penalty order dated April 16, 1992, imposing a penalty of Rs. 20,000 under section 7(2) of the 1954 Act. The case of the applicant in brief is that the vehicle was purchased from Lexicon Auto Pvt. Ltd. of Bilashpur in M.P. under bill dated March 31, 1992, with the aforesaid temporary motor vehicle registration and was being brought to Calcutta address of the applicant. One of the terms of the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pplication. According to them, applicant being a partnership firm, could not by itself be an applicant under section 8 of the West Bengal Taxation Tribunal Act, 1987. Its partners ought to have joined as parties. The person who signed the affidavit and the application, namely, Satya Narayan Chatterjee, is not supported by any evidence regarding authorisation. The application is also not maintainable because alternative remedies available under the statute were not resorted to. It may be mentioned that the present application was admitted by an order of this Tribunal dated January 28, 1993. At that time, the point of limitation was taken by the learned State Representative. That question was examined and decided in favour of the applicant. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... is a registered partnership firm can be treated as a "person" under section 8 of the 1987 Act, Mr. Chakraborty had relied on the provisions of the Bengal General Clauses Act, 1899 and the decision reported in [1962] 44 ITR 739 (SC); AIR 1962 SC 970 (Commissioner of Income-tax v. S.V. Angidi Chettiar). According to him, the applicant-firm is a person. But Mr. Majumdar stated that under the taxation laws of the State a partnership firm is not a dealer, but only its partners are regarded as a dealer. After considering the rival contentions of the parties, we are of the opinion that the applicant-firm is a "person" under section 8 of the 1987 Act and is, therefore, entitled to make the application. It is duly signed and affirmed in terms of ru .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re fact that the permanent address given in the motor vehicle registration certificate was not to be found at Siliguri, could not be sufficient ground for the conclusion that the sale transaction in favour of the applicant-firm was mala fide, particularly because the same temporary registration certificate also contained the Calcutta address of the applicant-firm. A few days after the order for penalty was passed, the impugned vehicle was permanently registered in the name of the applicant. In that view of the matter, we are not satisfied that there was any contravention of section 6 of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954 or there was any cause for imposing penalty under section 7(2) of the same Act. We are told that the entire penalty of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates