2009 (11) TMI 546

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Appellant. Shri M. Ravi Rajendran, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P. Karthikeyan, Member (T)]. - Impugned order was passed revising the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner. Vide the order impugned in Appeal No. ST/674/09, the Commissioner demanded Service tax of Rs. 2,23,072/- found to be due from the appellants towards GTA services availed by it during the period from January, 2 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... impugned order demanded tax from the appellants finding that the appellants were not eligible to the benefit of Notification on various other grounds. 3. We have also heard learned SDR who does not dispute this factual position. 4. On a careful consideration of the records of the case and the submissions made by both sides we find that the liabilities adjudged against the appellant are pri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X