2011 (3) TMI 132

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.   1. This order will dispose of CEAs No.158, 159, 168, 174, 176, 193, 209, 211 and 212 of 2010 as it is stated by learned counsel for the parties that questions of law involved in all these appeals are identical.   2. CEA No.158 of 2010 has been preferred by the assessee under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against order dated 4.9.2009 passed by the C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n favour of the assessee by order of this Court passed today in CEA No.7 of 2010 M/s Vee Kay Enterprises, Faridabad Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise.   4. Even though we have not issued notice in these appeals but having regard to the fact that the matter is covered and is only to be remanded to the Tribunal for passing an appropriate order on the issue of quantum of penalty, we dispose of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X