Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2012 (11) TMI 407

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oms Act, 1962. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that proceedings were initiated against an exporter, M/s. Radhika Exports, who had exported goods to Bangladesh under Bills of Export and claimed the drawback in contravention of the provisions of the Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995 read with Section 75A(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The goods were never transported through the Land Customs Station. Therefore, proceedings were initiated against the exporter and others including the present Appellant. Penalty was proposed against the Appellant under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the ground that he had allowed clearance of the said goods for exportation. The learned Commissioner while adjudicating the case .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... partment at no stage could show that he was entrusted with the work of the examination of the goods. The Appellant has produced a Notification bearing No. 01/Cus/WB/2005 dated 31-1-2005 issued by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), West Bengal, Kolkata, whereby the functions of the "Proper Officers" at Land Customs Stations were assigned to the officers for the first time and the Inspectors were termed as the "Proper Officers" for physical examination of goods. However, by virtue of the said Notification, the Superintendents were also assigned with the work of examination of goods covered under DFRC/DEPB/DECC and any other export promotion scheme. The contention is that the goods in the instant case were not covered under DFRC/DEPB/DE .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... that the Appellant was entrusted with the work and that he was required to participate in the physical examination of the goods. The learned Commissioner imposed the penalty for contravention of Section 50(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. For better appreciation, the relevant provisions are reproduced hereunder: "SECTION 50. Entry of goods for exportation. - (1) ................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... (2) The exporter of any goods, while presenting a shipping bill or bill of export, shall [xxx] make and subscribe to a declaration as to the truth of its contents." From the above, it .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates