2013 (4) TMI 98

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ri P.K. Kaurav, Dy. AG and Himanshu Shrivastava, Counsel, for the Respondent. [Order]. - As controversy involved in these petitions W.P. No. 10091/2012 - M/s. Unity Constructions v. M.P. State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., W.P. No. 10095/12 - M/s. Shubhanjali Construction v. M.P. State Tourism Development Corporation Ltd., W.P. No. 10097/12 - M/s. S & S Constructions v. M.P. State Touri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... service tax and the liability to make payment of service tax is of respondent No. 1. The petitioner has submitted a representation in the shape of a legal notice to respondent No. 1, copy of which if filed on record as Annexure P/4 dated 21-2-2012 and prayed in this petition that the respondent No. 1 be directed to decide the representation by a speaking order. 3. Shri P.K. Kaurav, learned c .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s detailed representation to respondent No. 1. 5. In view of aforesaid, these petitions are finally disposed of with following directions :- (i) Petitioners may submit a fresh representation with full particulars and the relief as prayed by the petitioners to respondent No. 1 within a period of two weeks from today. An advance copy of the representation be also sent to respondent No. 1 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X