2013 (4) TMI 124

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN 33490780672/2012-2013, to quash the proceedings dated 21.12.2012, and to direct the respondent to take up the provisional/original assessment of the petitioner for the assessment year 2012-13 after passing fresh orders for 2007-08 and 2008-09 in accordance with the directions issued by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... enior Counsel for the petitioner is that earlier this Court by order dated 6.12.2010 made in W.P.No.9060 of 2010 directed the respondent/department to pass final order and no such order has been passed and therefore, these notices issued time and again is causing prejudice. The relevant portion of the said order dated 6.12.2010 reads as follows: "5. In such view of the matter, the impugned notice .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er's plea that the respondent/department is keeping the matter pending for a long time and thereby prejudice is caused to the petitioner. 5. Heard Mr.Manoharsundaram, learned Government Advocate (Taxes) for the respondents, who states that the Court may direct the respondent to hear the objections and pass final order on merits within a time frame that may be fixed and the authority shall strictl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X