9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (4) TMI 164X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ants had imported garment accessories such as glass beads, lace, ribbon, tape, chain roll, chaton etc. The Revenue suspected that the appellant had mis-declared the quantity and the value of goods at the time of its import and they seized goods from the shops/business premises of the appellant. There was also seizure of goods covered under two Bills of Entry No. 288181, dated 4-3-2011 and Bill of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ey will not dispute/challenge the quantity and identity of the seized goods at any stage. 2. In respect of goods seized from container No. TGHU 8477189 covered under B/E No. 4231673, dated 1-8-2011. (i) On execution of Bond equivalent to the value of the seized goods Rs. 32,56,529/-. (ii) On payment of differential duty amounting to Rs. 2,86,000/-. (iii) On execution of Bank Guarantee of 25% o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the bond value covered fine and penalty that may be imposed. The Counsel for the appellant submits that they are presently not seeking provisional release of goods seized from the godown/shops and they are aggrieved only by the order in respect of the goods lying uncleared at the ICD. It is their contention that after payment of differential duty amounting to Rs. 2,86,000/- asking for bank guaran ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... more that the 25% of the differential duty and therefore if the goods are released on the terms of the order dated 6-3-2012 may not be possible to realise the fine and penalty that may be imposed. 6. Considered arguments on both the sides. The terms of the order dated 6-3-2012 safeguards both differential duty and fine and penalty to the extent of 25% of the differential duty amount. The fine an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
