9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (6) TMI 372X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ia, JJ. Shri Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate, for the Applicant. ORDER C.M. Nos. 28109-CII of 2011 & 20468-CII of 2012 : Allowed as prayed. C.M. No. 20469-CII of 2012 2. Annexures A-8 to A-11 filed along with the application are taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. CM stands disposed of accordingly. C.M. No. 28108-CII of 2011 4. CM is allowed and the delay in refiling the appeal is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al goods and raw material without payment of duty. During the period July, 2001 to 31-3-2005, the appellant imported goods and utilized the same in the manufacture of finished goods and exported finished goods as well as sold in the domestic market on payment of applicable duties. The respondent issued two show cause notices to the appellant demanding the duty amounting to Rs. 2,18,74,612/- along ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for condonation of delay. There is a colossal delay of 850 days in filing the appeal. No satisfactory explanation has been furnished. The plea taken in the application for condonation of delay is that the appellant-company being a sick company was lying closed and all its employees had left. There was only one male Director who due to heavy losses could not file the appeal. The said Director was ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
