TMI Blog2013 (8) TMI 781X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is there any adjournment application. Both appeals are rolling on the board since 2008. 2. On perusal of the adjudication order, it appears that the appellant No.2 M/s. Baranwal Carpet Manufacturing Co. is engaged in the manufacture of woollen carpet for export of the same by the appellant. M/s. Ikea Trading (India) Pvt. Ltd. The manufacturer Suomotu informed the customs authority about the discr ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ued at Rs.29,82,179/- with the consequence of imposition of redemption fine of Rs.1,00,000/- to redeem the goods. So also penalty of Rs.29,82,179/- was imposed on each of the appellants under section 114 (iii) of the Customs Act, 1962. 3. Ld. DR says that appellant did not come out with clean hand to prove their bonafide. 4. Heard Revenue and perused the records. 5. Record reveals that M/s. Bar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|