9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (1) TMI 1194X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tes of the Meeting held from 1-3-2012 till date of providing information. (B) Please provide the proposed deadline for rollout of SPV to provide common IT infrastructure to the Centre and the Status in GST/VAT region. (C) Please provide the date-wise details of the decision taken for the formation of the Company for the purposed SPV and proposed shareholding of its various constituents. (D) Please provide the copies of the suggestions/proposals and other documents received from various State Governments and Stakeholders for the constitution/formation of the Company for the purposed SPV. (E) Please provide copies of the documents regarding shareholding of the Central Government, State Gover ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (AA) vide order dated 7-2-2013 in which he had taken the view that even though the Cabinet had taken a decision in the matter in hand, yet the matter was not complete and 'over' as the process of the creation of GSTN - SPV was not yet complete and a number of steps were needed to be taken for the appointment of CEO and other functionaries. He had, thus, upheld the decision of the CPIO in withholding the balance information. 4. On the other hand, the appellant would submit that once the CPIO had offered inspection to him, it amounted to disclosure of entire information and, therefore, the CPIO's decision to withhold documents from him is not valid in law. More importantly, he submits that the Appellate Authority had passed the impugned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppellate Authority ask the CPIO to put up draft order before him for blindly appending his signatures thereon. As noted above, Shri Vijay Kumar, CPIO, has communicated in writing to the appellant that as desired by the Appellate Authority, he had put up a draft order which was signed by the Appellate Authority. This clearly demonstrates non-application of mind on the part of Appellate Authority. Hence, this order cannot be allowed to stand and is hereby quashed and the matter is remanded to the Appellate Authority with the direction to decide afresh after affording an opportunity of personal hearing to the appellant. 7. This order may be complied with in 5 weeks time. 8. Before parting with this matter, I may also observe that t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
