2006 (8) TMI 540

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None has appeared for respondents No. 3 and 4 although notices were duly served. The respondent No. 4, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, awarded a contract to respondent No. 3 for piling and civil works at Gauhati Refinery. Thereafter the respondent No. 3 gave sub-contract to the petitionercompany for the above work and the work was executed by the petitionercom .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nder the control of the Government. The above contention has not been controverted as affidavit-in-opposition has not been filed. Secondly, the learned counsel submitted that the contract was awarded by respondent No. 4, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., to respondent No. 3 and respondent No. 4 had collected or deducted the tax at source from the bills of respondent No. 3 and as such so far the State .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X