TMI Blog2014 (3) TMI 380X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed order. The respondent is also filed a Cross objection to the appeal of the Revenue. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondents are the manufacturer of cast articles of iron and steel and also manufactured inserts and other castings on job-work basis the activity of jobwork. While taking job work, the respondents used certain inputs on which they have availed credit. The jobwork goods ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... lenged the impugned order on the premise that the order of Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. has been challenged before the High Court. Therefore, impugned order is to be set aside. 4. The learned Counsel for the respondents submits that the appeal filed by the Revenue before the High Court of Bombay in the case of Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. was dismissed as reported in 2009 (244) ELT A89 (Bom.) the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has gone into manufacture of final product by jobworker which were ultimately suffered duty at the end of principal manufacturer. As the issue has been settled by the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Sterlite Industries (I) Ltd. (supra) and the appeal filed by the Revenue has already been decided by the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay therefore, I do not find any me ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|