Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2008 (8) TMI 851

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... period was not accepted by the assessing authority in view of the fact that in surveys dated April 13, 1987 and July 18, 1987 the account books were not found on the spot. The explanation submitted by the dealer that as none of the partners of the firm was present at the time of survey, the account books could not have been produced before the surveying officer, has been rejected. While rejecting the disclosed firing period the assessing authority fixed it at 98 days, i.e., from April 1, 1987 to July 7, 1987. It is not in dispute that the brick-kiln has been finally closed down with effect from September 30, 1987 due to some differences among its partners. The assessment order was challenged in appeal and the first appellate authority gra .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ,390 bricks for self use in the contribution of houses of two other partners, namely, Sri Khaliq Hussain and Sri Ramesh Chandra despite the fact that certificates given by Nagar Palika, Fatehpur and respective Gram Pradhan were on record? 5.. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in determining the average sale rate of Rs. 400 per thousand of bricks without appreciating the quality of bricks produced and relying on an exemplar whose situation of the kiln has not been mentioned? Shri M.M. Rai, the learned counsel appearing for the dealer-applicant submits that the authorities below were not justified in rejecting the account books due to their non-availability at the time of surveys. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the explanation given by the dealer having not been accepted, I find that the rejection of the account books is perfectly justified. Then, it was contended that the firing period fixed by the Tribunal at 91 days is without any basis. He submits that in a relevant assessment year the brick-kiln was fired on April 11, 1987. It was found by the surveying officer that the chamber up to 95 lines was filled up with baked bricks. The Tribunal concluded that it is not possible to bake the bricks to such a large quantity within seven days if the firing, as stated, started on, April 11, 1987 is correct. Challenging the aforesaid approach of the Tribunal the learned counsel invited attention of the court towards the assessment order wherein the openi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates