1981 (9) TMI 283

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ment have carefully considered the submissions in the revision application and the submissions made at the time of personal hearing. 2. The petitioners are manufacturers of coolers of various kinds and sizes assessable under Tariff Item 19A(2) of Central Excise Tariff. The issue to be decided is whether the value of divertors and wheels fitted to the coolers manufactured by them should be in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... included in the assessable value of the steel furniture. The petitioners also relied on same earlier order of the Government in support of their contention but did not furnish a copy thereof despite being asked to do so. 3. Government are unable to accept the petitioners contention. Government observe that the divertors certainly improve the functioning of the coolers and would therefore rightly .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4. The petitioners have raised another contention on the quantum of demand. They have stated that in the present case demand for differential duty was raised for four varieties of coolers manufactured by them by including the value of the divertors and wheels. However, in the case of one of these varieties, namely, "Coal King Coolers" they were never sold after fitment with wheels. They .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X