TMI Blog2014 (10) TMI 302X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ce to stay orders. Aforesaid scenario exhibits laxity of the Commissioners to pursue the litigations before the High Courts. Therefore we direct the Registrar to send a copy of this order expeditiously to the Revenue Secretary, Ministry of Finance for appropriate action so that Revenue shall be litigation free and its blocked Revenue shall be realised as early as possible. - E/2665/2008-EX(DB), E ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Lakhs, appellant went to Hon ble High Court of Allahabad in CA No. 33/2013 and Hon ble Court by order dated 21-3-2013 directed the Tribunal not to dismiss the appeal for want of pre-deposit. Simultaneously although Revenue has been directed by Hon ble Court to file its counter affidavit there is no consciousness of Revenue to reduce the litigation till today. E/314/2010 3. In bunch of appeal ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 8377; 21.00 Lakhs. It is given to understand that the appellant is under COFEPOSA. We surprise how Revenue does not pursue the matter and the Commissioners are very casual without informing the High Court about factual aspects of the matter to defend cases of Revenue. E/593/2011 5. In this case stay order was passed disposing stay application staying only penalty by order dated 23-3-2012. Ac ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the appellant has gone to Hon ble High Court of Allahabad in CA No. 76/2013. Hon ble Court by order dated 1-5-2013 directed that the appeal filed before Tribunal shall not be dismissed for want of compliance to the stay order. Revenue was directed by that order that within 3 (three) weeks it had to file counter affidavit. 8. Ld. DR has no instruction today as to the status of the said appeal b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
