TMI Blog2008 (7) TMI 955X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Revenue has filed this appeal under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 27.3.2007 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench `A', Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as `the ITAT') in ITA No. 1120/Chandi/2005 for the Assessment Year 2001-02, in case of the assessee, by raising the following substantial question of law :- "Whether, on the f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the Supreme Court against the revenue in Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax versus Core Health Care Ltd. (2008) 298 ITR 194 (SC). Counsel for the revenue does not dispute this legal position.
In view of the aforesaid decision of the Supreme Court, where the issue has already been settled, in our opinion, now no substantial question of law remains to be answered by this Court. Dismissed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|