TMI Blog2007 (5) TMI 597X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r direction commanding the respondents concerned not to interfere, in any manner, on the possession of the petitioners' shops and godowns allotted to them; (iii) issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents concerned not to compel the petitioners to enter into any agreement for taking shops/godowns allotted to them on rental basis. (iv) issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. The writ petition was filed on behalf of 143 firms and individuals carrying on business in agricultural produce and the respondents arrayed in the writ petition were (1) State of U.P. through Director, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Parishad, Lucknow; (2) Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Pilibhit through its Chairman; and (3) Secretary, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Pilibhit. 4. The case set up by the writ petitioners in the writ petition is as under. The petitioners are dealers in agricultural produce and have been granted licenses by the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti, Pilibhit, to carry on the said business. They were earlier carrying on business in Purana Galla Mandi in Pilibhit city ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the city. The writ petitioners had been allotted the shops etc. on rental basis and at no stage any assurance was given that the shops, godowns or sheds would be given to the writ petitioners on hire-purchase basis. At the outset, it was made clear to the traders that the Mandi Samiti was giving the shops, godowns and sheds on lease for which rent would be charged. It was denied that anywhere in U.P. a different policy was adopted or that shops or godowns had been given by the Mandi Samiti on hire- purchase basis. Regarding the letter of the Director allegedly sent in 1995, it was submitted that being a policy matter, it was the Mandi Parishad (Board) alone which could take such a decision and the Director had no authority to direct that the property of Mandi Samiti shall be given to the traders of agricultural produce, who are license holders, on hire-purchase basis. It was further submitted that the Inspector General and Commissioner of Stamps, U.P. had sent a letter dated 24.10.2002 to the Director, Mandi Parishad, U.P. that the agreement which was to be executed between the Mandi Samiti (Committee) and the traders required to be registered and stamp duty in accordance with Arti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and with effect from a date to be specified therein, constitute a Board by the name of the State Agricultural Produce Markets Board with its head office at Lucknow. (2) The Board shall be a body corporate by the said name having perpetual succession and a common seal and may sue or be sued by the said name and acquire, hold and dispose of property and enter into contracts. (3) The Board shall for all purposes be deemed to be a local authority. 26-L. Powers and functions of the Board. (1) The Board shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, have the following functions and shall have power to do anything which may be necessary or expedient for carrying out those functions (i) superintendence and control over the working of the Market Committees and other affairs thereof including programmes undertaken by such Committees for the construction of new Market yards and development of existing markets and Market areas; (ii) giving such direction to Committees in general or any Committee in particular with a view to ensure efficiency thereof; (iii) any other function entrusted to it by this Act; (iv) such other functions as may be entrusted to the Board by the Stat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e traders, it is not open to the respondents to contend that the business premises would be given to them by the Mandi Samiti on lease or rental basis. In this connection it may be pointed out that the writ petitioners have not filed any document whatsoever to show that either it was held out or any assurance was given by the respondents that the business premises would be sold to the petitioners on hire-purchase basis or otherwise. In fact, there is not a single piece of paper on record to substantiate the allegation made by the writ petitioners. Whether the shops, godowns and sheds of the Mandi Samiti, which have been allotted to the writ petitioners, should be given to them on lease or should be sold to them on hire-purchase basis, is purely a matter of policy as the property belongs to the Mandi Samiti or the Mandi Parishad. It is for the Mandi Samiti or the Mandi Parishad to take a policy decision in this regard and the Court cannot examine the correctness or otherwise of the said policy except in a very narrow compass. 10. In Netai Bag v. State of West Bengal (2000) 8 SCC 262, this Court held as under in para 20 of the reports : 20. The Government is entitled to make p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f authority. For testing the correctness of a policy, the appropriate forum is the Parliament and not the Courts........................ In Federation of Railway Officers Association v. Union of India (2003) 4 SCC 289, it was held as under in para 12 of the reports :- 12. In examining a question of this nature where a policy is evolved by the Government judicial review thereof is limited. When policy according to which or the purpose for which discretion is to be exercised is clearly expressed in the statute, it cannot be said to be an unrestricted discretion. On matters affecting policy and requiring technical expertise the Court would leave the matter for decision of those who are qualified to address the issues. Unless the policy or action is inconsistent with the Constitution and the laws or arbitrary or irrational or abuse of the power, the Court will not interfere with such matters. This being the settled position of law no direction can be issued to the respondents to transfer the shops, godowns or sheds to the writ petitioners on hire purchase basis. 11. The principal relief claimed by the writ petitioners is that a writ of mandamus be issued commanding the resp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
