New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (10) TMI 337 - CESTAT CHENNAI

2015 (10) TMI 337 - CESTAT CHENNAI - TMI - Waiver of pre deposit - Clandestine removal of goods - Held that:- Facts states by M/s. Maruthi Ploybags Pvt. Ltd., although prima facie convinces to certain extent to appreciate violation of natural justice, the material gathered during investigation equally demonstrates prejudice caused to Revenue by it. Accordingly, direction for pre-deposit against all the appellants is warranted in the fitness of the circumstances of the case. - Making overall asse .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

for appellant No. 1 For the Respondent : Mr B Balamurugan, AC (AR) ORDER Per: D N Panda: Ld. Counsel Shri S. Jayakumar, submits that there is a gross violation of principles of natural justice depriving the appellants from getting copies of the documents which were relied upon by ld. Adjudicating Authority in the adjudication. Investigation was made to the premises of the appellants on 14.06.11 and certain documents were found by the authority. Those were seized. On appraisal and evaluation of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

o form part of the adjudication. The moment appellants received those details, as enclosure to the letter dated 12.11.13 of the authority (copies thereof appears at page 244 of the paper book), it made further representation by communication dated 05.02.14 to the Authority to provide respective documents. The copy of the said communication appears at page 269 of the appeal folder. By that time, the appellants have already relied to the show cause notice. 3. Ld. Counsel further submitted that wit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

or by representation dated 12.05.14, to examine veracity thereof and use in adjudication. 4. It is further submitted that the aforesaid factual matrix exhibits the way the appellant was dealt deterrently in adjudication. Appellants further explained that it is a manufacturer of poly bags and also manufacturers the same by the job workers. So also it job worked the goods. Therefore, three types of activities of the appellant deserved consideration vis-à-vis the materials gathered in the co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version