TMI Blog2016 (1) TMI 90X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r. Dinesh Godara And Mr. Falgun Buch : For the Petitioner Mr. Niraj Kumar Jain on behalf of Mr. Mahendra Dave : For the Respondent ORDER 1. The facts are taken from the Revision Petition No. 604/2005, as the controversy involved in all these revision petitions is the same and the respondent-Assessee is also the same contesting party. 2. The petitioner Revenue has filed the present Revision ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he relevant portion of the findings of the Larger Bench of the learned Tax Board is quoted herein below for ready reference:- 4. However, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Assessee Mr. Niraj Kumar Jain informs the Court that the present Revision Petition filed by the Revenue has become infructuous, since the main appeal filed by the respondent-Assessee before the learned Tax Board ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|