9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (1) TMI 484X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mohan Bansal, Advocate For The Respondent : Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Advocate with Ms. Shriya Kalra, Advocate AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 1.10.2015 (Annexure A-6) passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gineer of Thermal Plant that whether any industrial or trading activity is being carried out by them; whether the work being done by co-operative societies of cleaning is of technical nature and whether it pertains to plant or machinery or office or residential area in Thermal Plant. In pursuance thereto, the office of Deputy Chief Engineer opined that the work of cleaning of station building/serv ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ction 78 of the Act and further imposed penalty of Rs. 2000/- under Section 77 of the Act. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) who vide order dated 17.12.2012 (Annexure A-3) reduced the amount of service tax from Rs. 9.86 lacs to Rs. 4.46 lacs and accordingly reduced the amount of penalty under Section 78 of the Act. Still dissatisfied, the appellant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the total service tax demand. 4. Learned counsel for the revenue opposed the prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant and submitted that the Tribunal has rightly directed the appellant to deposit the entire amount of service tax. 5. This Court vide order dated 15.12.2015 while issuing notice of motion for 23.12.2015 directed the Tribunal not to dismiss the appeal of the assessee f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
