9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (6) TMI 991X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Per: R. Periasami Vide miscellaneous order No. 41045-41048/2014 dated 26.06.2914, the appellants were directed to pre-deposit an amount of Rs. 1,25,00,000/- within a period of eight weeks and to report compliance on 03.09.2014. It was further stated that the deposit of Rs. 74,41,994/- already made by the applicants would be taken into account for this pre-deposit, subject to verification by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , Ld. Advocate was present and no proof of payment submitted. The Ld. AR submitted another verification report wherein the Service Tax Commissionerate vide letter dated 11.02.15 again clarified that on verification of records, the claim of the appellants that they have already paid an amount of Rs. 74,41,994/- which is to be adjusted against the pre-deposit ordered is not correct and stated that t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... elate to regular service tax payments. Further the appellants not deposited so far any amount as ordered to be paid in cash over and above the deposit claimed by the appellant. Since appellant was given final notice dated 11.02.15 to show cause why the appeal shall not be dismissed for non-compliance. Their miscellaneous application dated 21.04.15 again sought for modification/recall of notice and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
