TMI Blog2014 (8) TMI 1045X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . In view of the above observations in Sun Pharmaceuticals vs. CCE, Vapi [2013 (6) TMI-632-CESTAT-AHM], it is clear that more than one show cause notices decided under a single OIO filing of one appeal is sufficient. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 09.01.2013, passed by the first appellate authority is set-aside and the matter is remanded back to the first appellate authority to decide the i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the bench Para-5 of the OIA dated 09.01.2013 , that four appeals were filed by the appellant against a common OIO No. 41 to 44/AC/DEM/Silvasa dated 13.12.2011 but the Commissioner (Appeals) has decided only one appeal and with observations that against each show cause notice issued the appellant should have filed a separate appeal. Learned advocate relied upon the judgment in the case of Sun P ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the appellant has made the following observations:- 3. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that they have submitted single appeal against the same Order-in-Original, as the Order-in-Original has decided the four show cause notices by a single order and no four serial numbers were given by the adjudicating authority. In the appeal, they have mentioned the entire ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , we find that the? Order-in-Original was issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Division-II, Silvassa on 29-11-2011 and the order was despatched vide F. No. V(Ch.30)3-28/DEM/10-11/3943, dated 29-11-2011. We note that original authority had despatched only one Order-in-Original and not the four Orders-in-Original to the appellants. We, therefore, are of the view that one appeal fi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
