Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. SAIL Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Bolpur

Recovery of interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - Held that:- In the present proceedings appellant paid the entire duty within three months after being determined by Supreme Court, as required under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. - In view of the above observations and the settled proposition of law, order dated 24.04.2006 of the Adjudicating authority is based on a wrong premises that duty was determined against the appellant under Section 11A(2) of th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

paid within three months of such determination as per the provisions of Section 11AA(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, read with Explanation-I to this Section. In view of the above observations appeal filed by the appellant is required to be allowed. - Appeal No.EA-467/06 - Order No.FO/75168/2016 - Dated:- 15-2-2016 - DR. D.M. MISRA, MEMBER(JUDICIAL) AND SHRI H.K.THAKUR, MEMBER(TECHNICAL) For the Petitioner : Dr. S. Chakraborty, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri A. Roy, Supdt.(AR) ORDER PER .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing hearing, as well as through written submissions, argued that AC in charge of the appellant s unit vide adjudication Orders dt.11.03.1988 and 19.05.1988 decided the classification of appellant s product Pitch Creosote Mixture under CETA 2708.11 instead of CETA 2706.00 claimed by the appellant. That duty of ₹ 84,82,950/- was demanded from the appellant under 8 periodical show cause notices for the period September, 1985 to December, 9187. That the entire duty was deposited by the respond .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,950/- to the appellant during the period 04.10.2002 to 07.10.2002. That by an order dt. 28.01.2004 Apex Court reversed the orders, passed by CESTAT in favour of the appellant and held that the benefit of Notification No.121/62-CE dt.13.06.1961 and Notification No.75/84-CE dt.01.03.1984 to be admissible to the appellant only for the period from 01.09.1985 to 28.02.1986. That on receipt of Supreme Court s decision appellant paid duty of ₹ 67,85,100 (out of total disputed duty of ₹ 84, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion has been done under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. He made the Bench go through the relevant show cause notices and adjudication orders. That the findings of the Adjudicating authority that demands were earlier confirmed under Section 11A(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is thus ex-facie incorrect and contrary to the records of the case. He also relied upon the following case laws:- (a) CCE v. Eicher Demm [2010 (252) ELT 519 (HP)] (b) Caprihans India Ltd. v. CCE [2011 (267) .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

determination which will be the date of Apex Court s order in the case of appellant and differential duty was paid within 3 months of the date of determination. Learned Advocate relied upon Chhatisgarh High Court s decision in the case of Raipur Bright Steel & Wire Weld Industries Ltd. v. UOI [2014 (305) ELT 369(Chhatisgarh)]. (iv) That in any case there cannot be any demand for interest from the appellant, for the period 26.08.1995 to October 04.07.2002, when the duty amount was lying with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s case that as per case law CCE v. Orissa Concrete Products (India) Pvt.Ltd. [2001 (133) ELT 787(Tri.Kolkata)] interest under Section 11AA is payable after 3 months from 26.05.1995 when Section 11AA was introduced. Learned AR thus strongly defended the order passed by the Adjudicating authority. 4. Heard both sides and perused the case records. Issue involved in the present proceedings is whether interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 can be recovered from the appellant, wit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion 11AB, where a person chargeable with duty determined under sub-section (2) of section 11A, fails to pay such duty within three months from the date of determination, he shall pay, in addition to the duty, interest at such rate not below ten percent and not exceeding thirty-six percent per annum, as is for the time being fixed by the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette, on such duty from the date immediately after the expiry of the said period of three months till the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s reduced by the Commissioner (Appeals), Appellate Tribunal or, as the case may be, the Court, the date of such determination shall be the date on which an amount of duty is first determined to be payable. Explanation 2. -Where the duty determined to be payable is increased or further increased by the Commissioner(Appeals), Appellate Tribunal or, as the case may be, the Court, the date of such determination shall be, - (a) for the amount of duty first determined to be payable, the date on which .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

demands in the current proceedings by the show cause notices and earlier confirmed orders were not made under Section 11A(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Therefore, adjudicating authority under Order-in-Original No.7/COMMR/BOL/06 dated 24.04.2006 has wrongly stated that demands were confirmed under Section 11A(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It is observed that in all the show cause notices duty on Pitch Creosote Mixture was demanded under Rule 9, Rule 173 & Rule 53 of the Central E .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nder Central Excise law should be deemed to have been determined under Section 11A(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On the contrary appellant has relied upon Himachal Pradesh High Court s ruling in the case of CCE, Chandigarh vs. Eicher Demm (supra). In para 5, 7 & 8 of this case law Hon ble High Court made following observation:- 5.On perusal of Section 11-AA, which relates to payment of interest on delayed payment of duty, it is obvious that this section would become applicable only aft .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s to voluntary payment of duty before service of notice under Section 11-A(1). Admittedly, in the present case no notice was issued under Section 11-A till the time when the amount was deposited by the assessee. This notice was issued after three years. 7.In our considered opinion it is the first proviso which applies in the present case. The order, instruction or direction by the board can be issued in any manner. In the present case, the assessee deposited the amount after the respondent infor .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ause there is no order passed under Section 11-A and secondly, there is nothing on record to show that the assessee did not deposit the amount within 45 days of being informed of his liability. In fact, it is not the case of the Department that the assessee did not deposit the amount within 45 days. In the present proceedings appellant paid the entire duty within three months after being determined by Supreme Court, as required under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 4.3 In view of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version