9911796707
TMI Blog2007 (4) TMI 168X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ns the Petitioners are challenging the orders dated 28th March, 2005 passed by the Presiding Officer of the Textile Committee Cess Appellate Tribunal in the Appeals preferred by the Petitioners against the demand notices issued by the Textile Committee for recovery of cess. 3. The Tribunal has relied upon its own earlier judgment dated 30th April, 2004 and has given detailed reasonings fully just ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... uld come to the Court at the reasonable possible opportunity." In J.N. Maltiar v. State of Bihar - AIR 1973 SC 1343, Apex Court held that where the petitioner was informed that his service was terminated for misconduct, and spent about 3 years in sending memorials to the Government, a remedy not provided by law. The High Court was justified in dismissing the writ petition on the ground of delay. T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... under Sections 4 and 17(4) of the Land Acquisition Act, the petition was rejected on the ground of laches. In Abhinavodhanarda Villya Sankara Vihari v. P.R. Reddy - AIR 1986 SC 1511, where there was delay of four and a half years was not condoned, writ petition was filed on the technical plea that no notice has been served in the appeal filed by the State before the Tribunal. In Chandra Bhusan v. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
