Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2012 (11) TMI 1167

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... llant without any material, merely on the basis of statement recorded during survey under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that it was burden on the assessee to prove that the statement recorded by the Income Tax Officer, during the survey, was not correct. Both the authorities have erred in treating the statement under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, as incorrect, in absence of any corroboration by documentary evidence. It was submitted that this appeal may be admitted on the substantial questions of law as framed in the memo of appeal. 3. We have gone through the record and orders passed by the CIT (A) and Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 4. The facts of the case are that a survey u .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ecorded during the course of survey has no binding force nor it can be considered for the purposes of assessment as held by the Kerala High Court in the case of Paul Mathews and Sans vs. CIT, 263 ITR page 101 (Kerala). The assessee had submitted a detailed reply in this regard which has been verbatim reproduced by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order starting from page no.6 and completing on page no.11. The assessee had also filed a retraction of statement before the Commissioner of Income Tax. The Assessing Officer rejected the same that the retraction was submitted by the assessee after 2 1 /2 months of the survey. He however lost sight of the fact that all the books of accounts and documents were impounded by the survey authorit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on that basis has calculated its income and that had been offered for tax. Thereafter nothing remained to be explained as none is doubted by the Assessing Officer. It is thus manifest that income declared by the assessee fully covers all the accounts and documents found and seized by the survey party and there was absolutely no case for making any addition. The action of the Assessing Officer in making addition was based purely on statement recorded during the course of survey unless some other corroborative material was pointed out or brought on record by the Assessing Officer the action of AO is illegal. The Assessing Officer has not been able to substantiate the addition/surrender of Rs. 40 lakhs by bringing on record such material or e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ded any findings that the statement recorded under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act, was unbelievable, but considering the legal position as has been found by the CIT (A) and the Tribunal, the aforesaid contention has no merit. The view is supported by the judgments of various High Courts in (a) CIT Vs. Ms Dhingra Metal Works in ITA No.1111/2010 and (b) CIT vs. S. Khader Khan Son (2008) 300 ITR 157 (Mad), in which it has held thus : "In the instant case, there was a survey operation conducted under s. 133A in the assessee's premises and a statement was recorded from one of the partners. Assuming there were discrepancies and irregularities in the books of accounts maintained by the assessee, an offer of additional income for the resp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... CIT(A) and the Tribunal was rightly invited to the circular of the CBDT dt. 10th March, 2003 with regard to the confession of additional income during the course of search and seizure and survey operations.- Pullanquote Rubber Produce Co. Ltd. vs. State of Kerala 1972 CTR (SC) 253: (1973) 91 ITR 18(SC), Paul Mathews & Sons vs. CIT (2003) 181 CTR (Ker) 207: (2003) 263 ITR 101(Ker) and CIT vs. G.K. Senniappan (2006) 203 CTR (Mad) 447: (2006) 284 ITR 220 (Mad) relied on." 10. In view of the settled law of various High Courts as are referred in the order, we find that there was no error in the order passed by the CIT (A) and the Tribunal. This appeal does not involve any substantial question of law for our consideration. This appeal is accordi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates