Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (6) TMI 80

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... g the impugned reopening as invalid thereby deleting section 40(a)(ia) disallowance of Rs. 86,34,086/-. 3. We come to relevant facts first. The assessee-individual is engaged in construction work through his proprietary concern. He filed return on 31-12-2006 stating income of Rs. 6,40,490/-. The same was summarily processed. The Assessing Officer thereafter took up scrutiny. He completed a regular assessment on 11-12-2008 assessing taxable income of Rs. 6,72,440/-. First round of assessment appears to have attained finality at this stage. 4. It transpires from the case file that the Assessing Officer thereafter formed reason to believe that assessee's income liable to be assessed had escaped assessment. He issued section 148 notice dated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... year before expiry of the time prescribed u/s. 200(1) of the Act. It was observed from record that during the previous year relevant to A.Y.2006-07, the turnover of the assessee was Rs. 127,56,5844/- and the assessee had made 'job work' payments to sub-contractors amounting to Rs,86,34,086/-. As per section 194C(2) of the Act, TDS was deductible from the above payments. However, the auditors have stated in the certificate in form 3CD that no TDS has been deducted by the assessee during the previous year relevant to A .Y .2006-07. Since the assessee had made the above payments without deducting tax there from, these expenses were required to be disallowed as per section 40(a)(ii). The failure to deduct tax at source resulted in under as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... true. I have gone through the relevant facts of the case, the reasons recorded for reopening, the regular assessment order passed u/s 143(3), the audit report filed with the return, the reassessment order, the submissions of the assessee and the law related to the issue. The reasons recorded, as reproduced earlier in para.3.1. The reopening is within 4 years of the end of the assessment year in question and there is no requirement that there should be failure of the assessee to disclose true and full material facts, before reopening. The contentions of the assessee on this count are therefore rejected. The AO has formed his belief that income has escaped assessment on two counts. The first count is related to the second ground of a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n the assessment order make it apparent that the expenses have been examined in the original proceedings: During the course of assessment proceedings, written explanations have been furnished and books of accounts/bills/ vouchers/for expenses have been produced for verification and the same have been perused. (Para.2, page-1 of the assessment order) The submissions and details furnished during the course of assessment proceedings have been examined in view of various issues raised and the relevant facts and circumstances have been taken into consideration (Para.3, page-1 & 2 of the assessment order) As far as the audit report in Form 3CD and comments in Col.27 read together in sub-column (a) & (b) are concerned, the comments are no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... avour of the Assessing Officer's action in reopening the regular assessment framed in assessee's case resulting in section 40(a)(ia) of Rs. 86,34,086/- made on subcontractors payments because of his failure in deducting TDS. The assessee supports the CIT(A)'s order. He takes us to page 55 of paper book containing Assessing Officer's notice u/s. 142(1) dated 21-07-2008 seeking specific details of these payments at serial no. 10 along with documentary evidence. This is followed by his observations in assessment framed on 11-12-2008 that the above stated notice as well as assessee's explanation had been produced for verification and the same stood perused. It is evident to us that assessee's P & L account at page 75 of the paper book as well a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates