TMI Blog2001 (2) TMI 1032X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ted 5th January, 2000, wherein a writ petition filed by the Appellant has been dismissed. On 30th January, 1989, a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 had been issued for acquiring approximately 751.22 acres of land. On 8th February, 1990, notification under Section 6 was issued. On 29th February, 1992, Award was made. This land had been acquired by the Appellant for d ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mission was that the Agreement, on which reliance was placed to fix the compensation, contained two different prices at different places. We find no substance in this submission. The Agreement is a registered document. The price relied on is the price shown in the records. There is also, on the Agreement, the endorsement of the Sub-Registrar showing what the correct price was. All this makes it cl ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dy for whom the property is being acquired is given an opportunity to appear and adduce evidence for the purposes of determining the amount of compensation. Nothing could be shown to us that this had been done. On this point the matter requires to be sent back to the Special Land Acquisition Officer for refixing compensation payable. Thus the Appeal is allowed. We remit the matter back to the S ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ₹ 58/- per sq. yard outside the Municipal limits. We were informed that this amount has been deposited. By an order dated 29th September, 2000 this Court permitted the competent authority to disburse the amount deposited. We have been told that the amount has already been disbursed. Mr. Sibal has very fairly stated that the competent authority need not recall the amounts disbursed from the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
