Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Pushpanjali Floriculture Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India And Others

2016 (7) TMI 628 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Import of soda ash against Duty Free Import Authorization (DFIA) Scheme - Re-validation - exemption of anti-dumping duty - Reassessment of the ex-bond Bill of Entry - goods imported under the above pending clearance at ICD Ludhiana, with the petitioner unwilling to clear the goods without being extended the benefit of the DFIA scheme and the Customs authorities and the authorities under the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) unwilling to extend, to the petitioner, the benefit of the sai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the transferees thereof, that all benefits accruing under the said DFIAs read with the then existing FTP, HOP and DGFT Circulars etc would be available thereunder. It was on the basis of this promise, as held out by the respondent, that the petitioner invested considerable amounts in purchasing the said DFIAs from the original holders thereof in the belief that import benefits available to the said DFIAs at the time of issuance thereof would not be denied to it merely by erroneously applying the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Bill of Entry no. 7080616 dated 16.10.2014. - The prayer for granting exemption, so far as antidumping duty is concerned, is rejected - Decided partly in favor of petitioner. - CWP No. 12647 of 2016 - Dated:- 1-7-2016 - M. Jeyapaul And A. B. Chaudhari, JJ. Mr. Hari Shankar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sharan Sethi, Sr. Standing Counsel for the respondent ORDER M. Jeyapaul, J. 1. Written statements on behalf of all the respondents were filed and the same .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

2009-14, dated 21.08.2014, issued by the Ministry of Commerce, Government of India, or for reading down of the said Notifications/Public Notice/Circular, as to be applicable to licences issued under the Duty Free Import Authorization (DFIA) Scheme contained in Para 4 of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2009-14, after 01.08.2013. Consequent prayers, in the form of revalidation of the DFIAs No. 0310688209, dated 28.03.2012 and 0310690633 dated 13.04.2012, issued and subsequently transferred to the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

neral of Foreign Trade (DGFT) (Respondents 1 to 3 in the writ petition) unwilling to extend, to the petitioner, the benefit of the said Scheme, the writ petition has been treated as urgent and heard finally, with the consent of all parties. 5. The DFIA scheme is one of the export promotion schemes contained in Chapter 4 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014, and provides for duty free imports, by the holder of a licence issued under the said Scheme, of inputs specified thereunder. Licences issu .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns of any Authorisation granted. All imported goods shall also be subject to domestic Laws, Rules, Orders, Regulations, technical specifications, environmental and safety norms as applicable to domestically produced goods. No import or export of rough diamonds shall be permitted unless accompanied by Kimberly Process (KP) Certificate as specified by Gem and Jewellery EPC (GJEPC). 2.8 Every Authorisation shall be valid for prescribed period of validity and shall contain such terms and conditions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

duty on imports used in export product. Duty Remission Schemes consist of (a) Duty Entitlement Pass book (DEPB) Scheme and (b) Duty Drawback (DBK) Scheme. 4.1.11 Holder of Advance Authorisation, Advance Authorisation for Annual Requirement and Duty Free Import Authorisation intending to source inputs from indigenous sources/State Trading Enterprises, in lieu of direct import, as option to source them either against Advance Release Order (ARO) or Invalidation letter, the nominated in free foreign .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d Letter of Credit in accordance with the procedure specified in HBP v1. 4.1.13 Prohibited items of imports mentioned in ITC (HS) shall not be imported under Advance Authorisation/DFIA. Further items reserved for imports by STEs cannot be imported against Advance Authorisation/DFIA. However those items can be procured from STEs against ARO or Invalidation letter. STEs are also allowed to sell goods on High Sea Sale basis to holders of Advance Authorisation/DFIA holder. In addition, STEs are perm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icted items shall be subject to all conditionality is requirements of Export Authorisation or permission, as may be required, under Schedule II of ITC (HS). 4.1.14 In case of an Advance Authorisation, drawback shall be available of any duty paid material, whether imported or indigenous, used in goods exported, as per drawback rate fixed by DoR, Ministry of Finance (Directorate of Drawback). Drawback allowed shall be mentioned in Authorisation. 4.2.2 Provisions of para 4.1.3 shall be applicable i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

free inputs, except fuel and any other item (s) notified by DGFT. However, for fuel, import entitlement may be transferred only to companies which have been granted authorisation to market fuel by Ministry of Petroleum and natural gas. 6. As mentioned in para4.2.6 of the FTP, already extracted herein above, para 4.36A of the Handbook of Procedures (HOP), issued under the FTP and containing the procedures for implementing the provisions thereof, stipulated that- Once export obligation is fulfille .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

erability of the DFIA would be endorsed, by the DGFT, only after Export Obligation was fulfilled. It is an admitted position, in the present case, that the DGFT endorsed both the DFIAs transferable, in the case of DFIA dated 28.03.2011 on 10.07.2013 and in the case of DFIA dated 13.04.2012 on 28.09.2015. 7. The two DFIA Licenses,dated 28.03.2012 and 13.04.2012, involved in the present case, were originally issued to the Exporter. The DFIAs were duly transferable in terms of para 7.2 of Handbook .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

filed by the respondents, or during the course of oral submissions made before this Court. 8. The list of items permitted to be imported, duty free, under the said DFIAs, included Soda Ash, as per the amendment sheets, attached to the said licence. There is also no dispute on the fact that the Standard Input and Output Norms (SION) issued by the Central Government under the FTP also permit such import of Soda Ash against the subject exports. 9. Policy Circular No 72 (RE-08)/2004-2009, dated 24.0 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tion 4 of the Terms and Conditions attached to the DFIAs required the export obligation to be fulfilled by the DFIA holder, as per the terms and conditions specified in the FTP, 2009-14 and the HOP 2009-14 and guidelines issued by the DGFT from time to time. 12. Condition 12 of the DFIAs stipulated that all conditions of FTP and HOP and ITC (HS) Classification, as amended, would be applicable unless specifically dispensed with by the DFIA. 13. Consequent to the DGFT endorsing both the DFIAs tran .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

directed the petitioner to pay full duty on the goods, thereby denying to it, the benefit of duty free clearance under DFIA. This was, apparently and avowedly, because of the following Notifications/Circular/Public Notice, issued by the Ministry of Commerce, through the DGFT: (i) Notification No 31 (RE-2013)/2009-2014, dated 01.08.2013, (ii) Policy Circular No 03 (RE-2013)/2009-2014, dated 02.08.2013 (iii) Public Notice No 35 (RE-2013)/2009-2014, dated 30.10.2013 and (iv) Notification No 90 (RE .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

icable to DFIA holders, the impugned Notification dated 01.08.2013 supra amended para 4.2.3, by making DFIAs also subject to para 4.1.15 of the FTP, which itself was inserted only by the said Notification dated 01.08.2013. The said para 4.1.15 stipulated that, wherever the SION permitted use of generic input or alternative inputs, unless the name of the specific inputs got indicated/endorsed in the relevant Shipping Bills [S/Bs], and these inputs, so endorsed, matched the description in the rele .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, further clarifying that this has to be established in respect of every DFIA. 18. The impugned DGFT Circular dated 02.08.2013 stipulated that, in view of Notification No 31 dated 01.08.2013 supra, the earlier policy Circular No 30 dated 10.10.2005 becomes infructuous and hence stands withdrawn and reiterated that duty free import of inputs, under the schemes in Chapter 4 of the FTP, would be guided by Notification 31 dated 01.08.2013, and that any clarification issued by the DGFT to the said N .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tially completed before 01.08.2013, corresponding imports would be allowed subject to an undertaking from the DFIA holder that only inputs which had been actually used in the product already exported would be imported. 20. The impugned Notification, dated 21.08.2014 amended para 4.1.15 of the FTP, as inserted by Notification dated 01.08.2013 supra, by stipulating that the quantities or inputs permitted for import would be in proportion to the quantities which would be consumed in production, whi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sed the impossibility of compliance with the conditions stipulated in the impugned Notifications, Circular and Public Notice, which require specifications to be inserted in the Shipping Bills whereunder the exports, in fulfilment of Export Obligation, are made and, further, imports, only of such items, to be effected, as were used in the manufacture of the export product, irrespective of the SION norms. He submits that, where the exports were made prior to issuance of the DFIAs themselves, it is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n or before the date of issuance of the DFIAs. DFIAs issued prior to 01/08/2013, in other words, could not, according to the learned Senior Counsel, be subjected to conditions and limitations which came into being thereafter, in the impugned Notifications/Circular/Public Notice. The doctrine of promissory estoppel is also pressed into service, in this regard. 22. While learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No 4 does not seriously contest the writ petition, and states that his client is only a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

had been going on, which, according to him, was contrary to the very ethos of the DFIA Scheme. He has also sought to place reliance, in this regard, on the judgement of the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No 9955 of 2013 (Sevantilal& Sons v U.O.I.) which, according to them on the substantially similar issue. 23. We have bestowed our anxious consideration to the submissions made by the petitioner and by Respondents 1 to 3 as well as to the material on record and the various decisions r .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

relevant Bill of entry, the concerned Authorisation will not be redeemed. In other words, the name/description of the input used (or to be used) in the Authorisation must match exactly the name/description endorsed in the shipping Bill. At the time of discharge of export obligation (EODC) or at the time of redemption, RA shall allow only those imported which have been specifically indicated in the shipping Bill. (Emphasis supplied) As a matter of course, para-4.2.3 of the FTP was also amended, b .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cation/endorsement to be entered in the Shipping Bills whereunder the exports had already been effected. Clearly, therefore, requiring the holder or the transferee of the DFIA, which was issued on post-export bases, to comply with para-4.1.15 as inserted by the above-mentioned impugned Notification dated 01/08/2013, would amount to insisting on an impossibility. On the face of it, therefore, insistence on the said requirement would be hit by the well-established principle that no person could be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hasis supplied) 27. It has been emphasized, by the learned Senior Counsel appearing before us on behalf of the petitioner - and, we feel, rightly - that the italicized words, in para-4 of the impugned Notification dated 01/08/2013, are absurd, and reflective of total non-application of mind in issuance of the said Notification. Significantly, we find the same absurdity reflected in para-2 of the consequent impugned Public Notice No 35 (RE-2013)/2009- 2014, dated 30/10/2013, which reads thus: 2 I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

DFIA shall be in proportion to the quantity of input actually used / consumed in production. 28. How an importer could be required only to import inputs which have actually been used in products which already stand exported. SION norms are notified to prescribe permissible inputs against any export product. The DFIA is issued on such standard basis. It cannot be argued that what is contemplated by these clauses is only replenishment, as replenishment is an entirely independent concept, in respec .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

incorporation, in the impugned Notification and Public Notice, reflective, as the learned Senior Counsel has correctly emphasized, of total non-application of mind, on the part of the authorities issuing the said Notification/Public Notice. 29. Indeed, on the face of it, it appears that these covenants, by their very nature were never intended to cover the cases of post-export DFIA or transferees of such DFIAs. Else, the DFIAs would be rendered worthless for all such holders/transferees of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

para 1.2 of the FTP, whereunder the impugned Notifications dated 01/08/2013 and 21.08.2014 purport to have been issued, allow retrospective divesting, by any newly added provision, of the rights already available to the Licence holder /subsequent transferee, of the DFIA. It is well settled that the power to legislate retrospectively is not inherent, and has to be specifically conferred by statute no such power seems to emanate, either from Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and regulat .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

HOP and guidelines issued by the DGFT. Significantly, the words used in the said clause are as amended and not as amended from time to time. In any event, the provisions of the FTP, HOP, Notifications, Public Notices and guidelines issued by DGFT as amended till the date of issuance of the DFIA, would govern the DFIAs during their entire life. 32. The same position stands reflected in para 4.2.2. (b) of FTP, as amended w.e.f. June 2012, which reads as under: DFIA shall be issued in accordance w .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h read thus: Advance Authorisation shall be issued in accordance with Policy and procedure in force on Authorisation issue date. There is no reason to believe that the framers of the FTP intended the FTP to apply differently, in the case of the DFIA Scheme, as compared to the Advance Authorisation Scheme, especially in view of para-4.1 of the FTP, which already stands extracted herein above, and which parenthesize the Advance Authorisation scheme and the DFIA Scheme into one bracket. 33. DGFT Ci .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts under the subject DFIA during their lifetime. 34. Details of exports made in respect of subject DFIAs make it clear that even prior to issuance of the DFIAs exports had already taken place. Export Obligation Discharge Certificates (EODCs) in respect of the said DFIAs were also issued by the DGFT. This fact of discharge of Export Obligation also stands acknowledged by the DGFT by making endorsement of transferability on the body of the subject DFIAs which, as per para-4.2.6 of the FTP and para .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the DFIAs, it was held out by the respondent to the DFIA holders as well as, consequently, to the transferees thereof, that all benefits accruing under the said DFIAs read with the then existing FTP, HOP and DGFT Circulars etc would be available thereunder. It was on the basis of this promise, as held out by the respondent, that the petitioner invested considerable amounts in purchasing the said DFIAs from the original holders thereof in the belief that import benefits available to the said .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Notification dated 01.08.2013 (supra) applicable to all imports effected under the DFIA scheme thereafter. 38. Insofar as Notification dated 21.08.2014 is concerned, again, the stipulation in the newly introduced clause (b) in para 4.1.15 of the FTP, to the effect that proportion of inputs actually used or consumed in the production of export products, shall be clearly indicated in the S/Bs cannot be made applicable to cases where DFIA is already issued prior to such stipulation, or exports .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tter. DFIA is issued in terms of the SION norms. Duty free import benefits on all items referred to in the said licences as per the SION as on date of its issuance have, therefore, to be guaranteed to the licence holder as well as to all bonafide transferees thereof. Such benefit cannot be whittled down and truncated on the basis of any notification or executive instructions that may be subsequently issued after issuance of the DFIA. All such notifications or instructions would, therefore, be in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by introducing a provision to the effect that exemption from anti-dumping duty would be available on actual user basis only, before endorsement of transferability. It was in this context that the petitioner, in that case, contested its right to avail the benefit of exemption from anti-dumping duty. It specifically recorded in para 38 as follows- 38. Equally, we are not required to consider whether any subordinate legislation is being amended retrospectively. Unlike Sevantilal (supra), we are in .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

very ethos of the DFIA scheme itself, and not sanctioned by any of the provisions thereof. 42. Although we are of considered opinion that in absence of any power of amendment with retrospective operation, any subsequent issuance of any notification or instructions by Central Government or any other authority would not divest, the licence holder or the transferee, of the benefits promised on the date of issuance of DFIA, however, it is seen that the validity of the Customs Notifications which ar .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

any power under section 5 of the FTDR Act, 1992 for any retrospective amendment, several such amendments / instructions are being issued and are being arbitrarily applied in a retrospective manner. Some notifications of such nature are already struck down such as DGFT Notification No. 4 (RE:2013)/ 2009-14 dated 18.04.2013 withdrawing deemed benefits for supplies to Non-Mega Power Projects - Hon ble High Court of Gujarat struck down the Notification in the case of Alstom (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tioner. The Hon ble Supreme Court in the matter of Sandeep Exports Ltd., 2004 (9) SCC 128 had directed the Respondents to issue certificate for the purpose of revalidation of expired licenses due to disputes raised by the department. We are satisfied that due to the impugned invalid notifications / Public Notice / Circular, licenses could not be utilised by the petitioner. The petitioner cannot be expected to present licenses for debit in such circumstances. Therefore, a case for directing reval .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version