2010 (6) TMI 821

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sed Representative (JCDR for the appellant Mr. Gajendra Jain, Advocate for the respondent JUDGEMENT Per: P.G. Chacko: This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) holding that the commodity ("Malt Extract" as it is called by the department and "WORT" as it is called by the assessee), on which the department wanted to levy duty .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mmissioner of Central Excise as adjudicating authority dropped a similar demand of duty following the Tribunal's decision cited above. We are also told that the Commissioner's order has not been challenged. 3. In the result, the impugned order is upheld and this appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. The so-called Cross-Objections also gets disposed of for the record. (Dictated in Court)

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X