2007 (6) TMI 532

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... & Mr. Parag Vyas for Respondents. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this petition, the Petitioner is challenging the order dated 29th September, 2006 whereby the CESTAT has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner for non-deposit of an amount of ₹ 10 lakhs which was directed to be made by way of pre-deposit as per its earlier order dated 20th October, 2005. By an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has already deposited ₹ 6.5 lakhs out of the pre-deposit amount of ₹ 10 lakhs and that the Petitioner undertakes to deposit the balance amount of ₹ 3.5 lakhs within a period of eight weeks from today. Hence, it is made clear that if the aforesaid balance amount of ₹ 3.5 lakhs is deposited by the Petitioner within a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X