TMI Blog2015 (7) TMI 1126X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... well as the appellate authorities and the same was confirmed by the CESTAT - Held that:- the present appeals are connected with C.E.A.No.51 of 2004 and batch, which were allowed by this court by a common order in favour of the assessee, allowing the claim of the assessee for refund of the excise duty. - Appeals allowed - CEAMP.NOs. 29 and 30 of 2014 in C.E.A.NOs. 38 AND 44 OF 2004 AND CEAMP.NO.2 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ice Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), South Zonal Bench Bengaluru. In C.E.A.No.18 of 2004, the claim of the appellant was rejected both by the primary as well as the appellate authorities and the same was confirmed by the CESTAT. Both the learned counsel submitted that the present appeals are connected with C.E.A.No.51 of 2004 and batch, which were allowed by this court by a common order dated ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
