Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

ACIT, Central Circle-5, New Delhi Versus M/s Plastograph India Pvt. Ltd. and Vica-Versa

Addition u/s 68 on account of unexplained share capital - Held that:- The assessee is a private limited company whose functioning capability strengths etc. would be known only to its close knit circle of friends and Directors and promoters who would be privy to this information. The Private Ltd. Company and such known concerns known to the said company would operate on internal information available to them and it is generally not easily available in the public domain. Thus necessarily the share .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Director, Sh. Rajendra Agarwal in 2009-10 AY and a surrender has been made of ₹ 45 lakhs is sufficient evidence for the Revenue to conclude that such behavior for Director was a norm and not an aberration. - Accordingly the company having been given an opportunity to prove that the transactions were genuine the onus in the peculiar facts and circumstances cannot be said to be discharged by placing insufficient evidences. The evidences now on record stated to be filed all along a posi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cted to pass a speaking order in accordance with law on the jurisdictional aspect first and thereafter if need be on merits after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. - I.T.A .No.-3556/Del/2012, C.O.No.301/Del/2012 - Dated:- 27-7-2016 - SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH.O.P.KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Assessee : Mrs. Nandita Kanchan, CIT DR For The Revenue : Sh. Vinod Kr. Bindal, CA ORDER PER DIVA SINGH, JM The present appeal has been filed by the Revenue assaili .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of transaction as well as the identity and creditworthiness of the person who contributed the share capital. 3. The appellant craves leave to add, amend any/all the grounds of appeal before or during the course of hearing of the appeal. 1.1. The assessee has also filed C.O. on the following grounds:- 1. The additions in the impugned assessment order passed u/s 153 are bad in law and on facts because a) the additions were not based on any books of account or other material not produced in the c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ete or amend all or any ground of appeal either before or at the time of hearing. 2. The relevant facts of the case are that a search and seizure operation under section 132 of the income tax act was carried out in Raj Darbar group of cases on 31.07.2008 wherein certain documents belonging to the assessee company were also seized from the residence of Sh. Rajendra Aggarwal, Director of the assessee s company. Accordingly proceedings under section 153C of the Income Tax Act was initiated in the c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. 1000 5,00,000/- 3. M/s Reliance Polycreate P.Ltd. 3000 15,00,000/- 4. M/s Viv Sun Properties 1000 5,00,000/- 2.1. The assessee was required to prove the genuineness of the transactions by filing evidences in respect of share application money received during the year. In response thereto the assessee filed Shared Allotment Form as filed before the RoC. No other document such as confirmations, copies of share application form, Income Tax Return acknowledgement, bank account copies etc. were fil .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

response thereto Sh. Rajendra Agarwal as per record vide letter dated 12.9.2008, addressed to the Dy. Director of Income Tax (Inv), Unit-II(l), New Delhi stated that he bought back Shares back from these companies by paying cash amount over and above the value recorded in his books of accounts leading to the surrender of ₹ 45,00,000/- as his personal undisclosed income for the A.Y. 2009-10. The AO concluded that these facts clearly showed that the group is involved in introducing unaccoun .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as caste upon it by section 68 of the Act as it had failed despite opportunity to file any supporting document. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee came in appeal before the First Appellant Authority. In support of its claim it was submitted that on 23.12.2010 the assessee had filed copies of Share Application Form along with ITR and bank account copies etc. and there was no provision under the Act to ask for balance sheet of a shareholder. In the face of these evidences having been placed on record whe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ents made by each of them thus their creditworthiness stood proved. Further, the amounts having been received through banking channels, it was submitted proved the genuineness of the transactions. Moreover since all of these were incorporated bodies or individuals, their identity was also stated to be proved beyond doubt. Apart from these facts it was submitted nothing more was available with the assessee as at the time of receiving share application money or allotment no other information is re .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nst them. Reliance was also placed on latest information/documents made available vide letter dated 29.12.2011 consisting of information downloaded from the portal of Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Considering these facts and arguments, the CIT(A) deleted the addition holding as under:- 6. Determination: The first and second grounds of the appeal are about the addition of share capital investment made u/s 68 of the Act and are disposed off together. The appellant has filed information as mention .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts. Nothing is apparent from assessment order that any adverse material exists in the assessment folder for the relevant period. It is not the case where any person claimed before the revenue that the impugned share capital is nothing but bogus introduction by way of accommodation entries. In the impugned appeal the issue is squarely covered by the earlier judgments in the case of Lovely Exports Pvt. Ltd., Divine Leasing and Finance Ltd. (supra) etc cited in the above preceding paragraphs as non .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ant company at the relevant time but also reflects that they are regular in their business activities on year to' year basis and there has been increase in their own funds ever since they made investment in the appellant company. All these companies have made substantial investments in the equity share capital of the listed as well unlisted scrips and some of them are blue chip companies. It is not the case where the equity was invested in the appellant company only by the investor companies .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

re established. Besides, they had enough resources to make the impugned investments in the relevant period. The genuineness of the transaction has also not been found contrary to the audited books of account by the assessing officer. In absence of any material contrary to the information on record, the action of the assessing officer based on surmises and conjecture while making addition u/s 68 of the Act in respect of share capital received cannot be sustained. Thus the addition of ₹ 50,0 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ual finding warranting relief. 6. The Ld. AR filed a copy of the order of the ITAT dated 13.04.2016 in ITA No. 3053/Del/2012 and 2611/Del/2013 and others in the case of M/s Rite Pack Industries Private Ltd vs DCIT. Relying upon para 6 of the said order, it was submitted that on identical facts and circumstances the ITAT had restored the issue back to the assessing officer to pass a speaking order in accordance with law after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. In the fac .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

31/12/07 Date of Search 31/07/08 Date of recording of satisfaction u/s 153C 21/07/10 6.1. Accordingly it was his prayer that the assessment for the AY 2005-06 was not abated [and deemed to be completed u/s 143(1)] as on the date of recording satisfaction. 7. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material available on record. We find that though the assessee as per the chart has claimed that original return u/s 139 had been filed on 28.10.2005 and supported its claim by filing a pho .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

m it appropriate to set aside the impugned order following the view taken by the Co-ordinate Bench in ITA No.3053/Del/2016 & Others in the case of M/s Rite Pack Industries Pvt.Ltd. vs DCIT. We further find that whereas the AO categorically holds that apart from the Share Allotment Form nothing else was filed by the assessee despite opportunity. The CIT(A) has accepted the argument that PAN, ITRs and copies of Bank Accounts etc. were filed on 23.12.2010 before the AO. Apart from the obvious c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

from the public domain and relied upon has not discussed the specifics of the evidences and the facts leading to general observations that there were sufficient funds available with the parties have not been brought out in the order. The correctness of these conclusions in the absence of discussion on facts is not possible. We further find that the facile argument advanced on behalf of the assessee that the law requires only a company to satisfy itself at the time of share allotment with only li .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

company would operate on internal information available to them and it is generally not easily available in the public domain. Thus necessarily the shareholders are limited to persons or concerns managed by the close knit circle of family and friends of the assessee. Accordingly the benefit of arm s length distance between a shareholder of a Public Ltd. Company with the company cannot be claimed by a shareholder in a Private Ltd. Company as the shareholders necessarily would be companies/entiti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Notification: Seeks to exempt goods imported for organising FIFA under 17, world cup, 2017

Forum: Wrong quote of GSTIN no of buyer in GSTR-1

Forum: Getting upload error message.Cannot upload json file for GSTR1 even after using offline tool V 1.2..

Forum: Issue of Payment Voucher

Forum: filing of unaudited financial accounts

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: need of extention of agm in case of non filing

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Article: INELIGIBLE INPUT TAX CREDIT UNDER GST REGIME

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Article: All about E-way Bill under GST

Highlight: Provision for sick leave liability - based on the basis of notional figures - such notional liability cannot be allowed as deduction - section 43B(f) is not applicable.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the amended provision of Explanation 5A made applicable w.r.e.f from 1.6.2007 cannot be pressed into service.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version