TMI Blog2012 (5) TMI 725X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nue by : Dr. B.R.R. Kumar, DR ORDER A.N.Pahuja:- This appeal filed on 07.12.2011 by the Revenue against an order dated 12.09.2011 of the ld. CIT(A)-XIX, New Delhi, raises the following grounds:- 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the learned CIT(A) has erred in allowing the appeal of the assessee company by holding that the interest on FDR etc. amoun ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r consideration. On perusal of profit and loss account , it was revealed that the assessee earned interest income amounting to Rs. 91,26,226/- from the deposits in the banks and thus, wrongly claimed set off of brought forward business loss against such interest income . To a query by the AO, seeking to assess interest income from deposits in the banks under the head 'Income from Other Source ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... m bank deposits. Accordingly, relying upon the decisions in Orissa Tyres Ltd. vs CIT, 188 ITR 342;Collis Line(P) Ltd. vs. ITO,135 ITR 390(Ker);CIT vs. Jose Thomas,253 ITR 553(Ker.);CIT vs. Manglam Cement Ltd.,217 ITR 369(Raj.);Saraf Textile Industries,217 ITR 507(Raj.);Shree Krishna Polyster Ltd. vs. DCIT,274 ITR21(Bom.); CIT vs. Gimpex P Ltd.,268 ITR 377(Mad.) CIT vs. Monarch Tools Pvt. Ltd.,26 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the Revenue against the said decision of the ld. CIT(A) has been dismissed by a co-ordinate bench vide their aforesaid decision dated 15.6.2011 in the assessee's own case in I.T.A. no.103/D/2011. Since the facts and circumstances in the year under consideration are parallel to the facts and circumstances in the preceding assessment year, wherein the ld. CIT(A) concluded that interest on bank ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
