2016 (10) TMI 233

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Member Present  Shri R.K. Manjhi,   A.R. for the  appellant/Revenue Present Shri K.K. Anand, Advocate for the respondent ORDER The present appeal is filed by the Department against the impugned order dated 5.3.2009 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise. Jaipur II. 2.  The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the manufacture of  cement .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lant that it was done to ensure that the customer will not get less than 50 kgs.  To avoid loss in transit/handling, a slight higher filling is done. 5.  From the record, it also appears that in CBEC Circular No.876/14/2008-CX, dated October 20, 2001, there is a  provision to allow 1% variation in weight for the cement filled in per bag for the purpose of  levy of central exci .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X