2010 (11) TMI 1041

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Per : P.G.Chacko We had directed the appellant to pre-deposit an amount of ₹ 3 crores under Sec.35F of the Central Excise Act within 12 weeks and to report compliance on 12.7.10 vide stay order dated 12.3.10. The appellant, instead of pre-depositing the amount, filed appeals before the Hon'ble High Court against the Tribunals order. Those appeals were disposed of by the Hon'ble High Court .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... compliance of the undertaking. In the event of failure to comply with the undertaking within stipulated period, these appeals shall be deemed to have been rejected and the Tribunal shall be free to dismiss the appeals pending on its file, filed by the petitioners herein. All the above appeals stand disposed of in the terms of this order with no order as to cost. 2. The time granted by the Hon'bl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... as prayed for in this Notice of Motion. The Notice of Motion is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. 3. In the result, the appeals can only be dismissed in terms of the Hon'ble High Court's order dated 29.7.10. Accordingly, the 3 appeals are dismissed for want of compliance with Sec.35F of the Central Excise Act as applicable to Service Tax appeals. (Pronounced in court)
Case la .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X