TMI Blog2012 (5) TMI 730X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s an assessee's appeal directed against the order of ld. CIT (A)- VIII, Ahmedabad, dated 15.09.2011 for assessment year 2007-08. 2. The assessee is aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT(A), confirming the order of A.O., imposing penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Act. At the time of hearing, the application for adjournment was received on behalf of the assessee. As no cogent reason was given in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ct by not furnishing requisite information/documents/clarification etc., as per ratio laid down in the case of Gujarat Travancore Agency vs. CIT (1989) 177 ITR 455. Hence, penalty of Rs. 50,000/-(Rs.10,000/- for each default as discussed above) is hereby levied u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act." 3. This action of the Assessing Officer was confirmed by ld. CIT (A). 4. After hearing the ld. D.R. and per ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ale of Rs. 23097648/-. 4. With the above remarks and on the basis of details available with the return, besides, details submitted in response to notice u/s 142 (1) of the act, the total income of the assessee company is computed as under:- Total income as per statement of income Rs. 299050/- Total Assessed income Rs. 299050/-" 5. It is apparent from the above that the asses ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|