2008 (8) TMI 940

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ORDER [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. 2. Shri Partha Banerjee, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellants states that the appellants produce non-alloy steel for which determination was done under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act and the appellants accordingly paid the duty as per the ACP fixed. During the impugned year 1999 to 2000, the appel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . of C.E., Raigad - 2006 (199) E.L.T. 721 ( Tri.-Mumbai). He further states that in the case of the appellants, it has been clearly recorded in the stay order passed by the Tribunal that only 168 M.T. of stainless steel were cleared as against 2503 M.T. of non-alloy steel and hence predominantly the appellant produced goods covered under the Compounded Levy Scheme. 3. Heard the ld. DR. He re .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X