2012 (4) TMI 696

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (T) Shri B.L. Narasimhan, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri K.P. Singh, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Mathew John, Member (T)]. - The appellant had advance authorization license and imported certain raw material after executing bond with the customs authorities regarding duty liability that may arise if the condition of such license is not fulfilled. In respect of 5 licenses issu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... license, they have now received EODC and in respect of the remaining 5, the process is still going on because there were certain issues relating to policy relaxation for which they had approached the Policy Relaxation Committee. Now such relaxations have come and they have submitted applications for issue of EODC in view of the relaxation given and such EODCs are expected shortly. Therefore, he s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... been exporting goods through the same customs station and also in view of the evidence that the appellant has been appearing before the same officer in connection with other exports. In the circumstances, we do not appreciate the order passed without serving a show cause notice and without personal hearing. 5. Since the order is passed without complying with the principles of natural justice .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X