2015 (2) TMI 1191

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appellant and Mr. Kuntal Parikh for Mr. Paresh M. Dave, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. While admitting this appeal on 19-12-2007, the following substantial questions of law were formulated : "(a)    Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in holding that the goods were not liable for confiscation under Section 111(d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the respondent was called upon to show as to why Polyester Dyed Piled Fabrics amounting to Rs. 26,50,819.42 should not be confiscated. The said notice was adjudicated by the Commissioner (Adjudication) Central Excise, Ahmedabad vide Order-in-Original dated 27-4-2005 and ordered confiscation of Polyester Dyed Piled Fabrics amounting to Rs. 26,50,819.42. The Adjudicating Authority also imposed penal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X