Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Sree Lakshmiganapathi Seva Samiti and Sri Vigneswara Vari Devasthan Sangam Versus CIT, Vijayawada

Reopening of assessment - exemption claimed by the assessee u/s 11 denied - corpus donations and advance given to Gopisetty Mallaiah & Co. - revision u/s 263 - Held that:- In the present case on hand, on perusal of the facts available on record, we find that the A.O. has conducted detailed enquiry and also examined the issues pointed out by the CIT in his show cause notice. The assessee explained each and every issue pointed out by the CIT with necessary evidences. The CIT cannot assume jurisdic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The assessment order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, is not erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue in so far as three issues pointed out by the CIT in his order with regard to corpus donations, applicability of maximum marginal rate and advance given to Gopisetty Mallaiah & Co. In so far as determination of income from house property, the CIT has rightly revised the assessment order, as the A.O. has failed to examine the issue to bring the co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt by : Shri A.C. Gangaiah, AR For The Respondent by : Shri G. Gurusamy, DR ORDER PER G. MANJUNATHA, Accountant Member: These 8 appeals filed by two different assessees are directed against separate, but identical orders of the CIT, Vijayawada u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as 'the Act') for the assessment years 2007-08 to 2010-11. Since, the facts are identical and issues are common, they are heard together and disposed off, by this common order for the sake of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

, without any registration u/s 12AA of the Act, accordingly, the income chargeable to tax has been escaped assessment for the assessment year 2007-08 to 2010-11. In response to notice u/s 148 of the Act, the assessee society has filed revised return of income for the assessment year 2007-08 to 2010-11 declaring nil total income after claiming exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The case has been selected for scrutiny and accordingly, notice u/s 143(2) of the Act and 142(1) of the Act along with questio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, shall not be revised under the provisions of section 263 of the Act. The CIT, proposed to revise the assessment order, for the reason that on examination of assessment records, certain omissions and commissions were noticed which rendered the assessment order erroneous, in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue within the scope of section 263 of the Act. The CIT, in the said show cause notice, observed that the A.O. accept .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

te for any of these assessment years when assessee s status is an AOP in the absence of registration u/s 12A of the Act ad also the shares of its members are indeterminate. Similarly, the CIT further observed that on verification of statement of computation of total income filed along with return of income, it is noticed that the assessee has admitted income from house property of ₹ 2,30,551/- whereas the A.O. has assessed income from house property at ₹ 1,77,834/-. The CIT further o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

servations, issued a show cause notice dated 23.1.2014 and asked to explain why the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act for the assessment year 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-11 shall not be revised under the provisions of section 263 of the Act. 4. In response to show cause notice, the assessee submitted that the assessment order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act is not erroneous, in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, as the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the assessee has furnished necessary details to the satisfaction of the A.O. The A.O. after examining the details furnished by the assessee has accepted the explanation and assessed the income which cannot be termed as erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. 5. The assessee further submitted that in respect of maximum marginal rate of tax, the assessee is a registered society under the provisions of Societies Registration Act with the main objective of charitable .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

terest of the revenue. As regards the corpus donations, the assessee submitted that the society has collected corpus donations from members of public for the purpose of establishment of old age homes and construction of temple building and the donors have donated the amount with a specific direction to use the funds for the objects of the trust and accordingly it has rightly treated specific donations received from the public as corpus donations. The A.O. after examining the relevant details has .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

considering the submissions of the assessee held that the assessment order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, as the assessing officer has failed to examine the issues pointed out in the show cause notice with reference to necessary details before allowing exemption towards corpus donations and also taxing the income under normal rate of tax applicable to individual/AOP. The CIT, further, observed that t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

h as testamentary instructions which is necessary to prove the donations is with a specific direction or not. 7. The CIT, further, observed that the A.O. wrongly taxed income of AOP society under normal rate of tax applicable to individual/AOP, even though the assessee AOP is not registered under the provisions of section 12A of the Act and also the shares of its members are indeterminate. As regards advance given to Gopisetty Mallaiah & Co., the A.O. failed to examine as to whether any part .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

717/- in respect of income from house property. The A.O. without examining the above details simply accepted income of ₹ 1,77,834/- as against the correct income of ₹ 2,30,551/- which render the assessment order erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. With these observations, set aside the order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act, for the assessment years 2007-08 to 2010-11, with a direction to re-do the assessment de-novo in accordan .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the CIT was not correct in directing the A.O. to conduct further enquiries with regard to the issues which were already examined by the A.O. by issuing detailed questionnaire at the time of assessment. It is further submitted that the A.O. has examined the issue of corpus donations, applicability of maximum marginal rate of tax in respect of surplus income, and advance given to Gopisetty Mallaiah & Co.. The A.O. after satisfied with the details furnished by the assessee completed the assessm .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n is drawn that the A.O. has verified the details and after satisfied with the explanation furnished by the assessee accepted the explanation and accordingly, the CIT is not correct in stating that the A.O. has not conducted proper enquiry of the issue at the time of completion of assessment. 9. The A.R. further submitted that as regards corpus donations is concerned; the assessee has collected corpus donations from members of public for the purpose of establishment of old age home and construct .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

such society shall be assessed as AOP and the rate of tax applicable to such society is normal rate of tax applicable to AOP/individual. In so far as advance to Shri Gopisetty Mallaiah & Co., the A.R. submitted that the assessee has advanced a sum of ₹ 10 lakhs for the purpose of construction of old age home on the site purchased by the Samiti during the financial year ending 31.3.2010. This fact was brought to the notice of the A.O. and the A.O. has verified this information and chos .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n to revise the assessment order, as the A.O. has failed to examine the issues of corpus donations, maximum marginal rate of tax and income from house property. The D.R. further submitted that in respect of income from house property, the A.R. conceded that he has no explanation to offer which evidenced that the A.O. has not examined the issue at the time of assessment; therefore, the CIT rightly assumed jurisdiction and his order should be upheld. 11. We have heard both the parties, perused the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arious issues which caused prejudice to the interest of the revenue. The CIT, further, was of the opinion that the A.O. has completed the assessment without examining the issue with regard to allowability of exemption to corpus donations, applicability of maximum marginal rate of tax to AOP, determination of income from house property and advance given to Gopisetty Mallaiah & Co., President of the Society. The CIT, further, observed that the assessee claims to have received corpus donations, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nce given to one of the members of the society without examining the applicability of whether any part of income or property of the assessee was directly or indirectly used for the benefit of interested persons, thereby any violation of the provisions of section 13 of the Act. The A.O. not only failed to examine the issue, but also failed to apply his mind on various issues, which render the assessment order erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. 12. It is the c .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rnished all the details with regard to corpus donations and also explained why maximum marginal rate of tax cannot be applied to its income. Similarly, the assessee has explained the purpose for which advance of ₹ 10 lakhs given to the Gopisetty Mallaiah & Co., therefore, the CIT was not correct in coming to the conclusion that the A.O. has not conducted enquiry of the issues. We find force in the arguments of the assessee for the reason that the A.O. has examined all the issues pointe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

efore, the CIT was not correct in coming to the conclusion that the A.O. has not conducted proper enquiry of the issues before completion of the assessment. 13. The CIT, assumed jurisdiction to revise the assessment order on the ground that there is a lack of enquiry on the part of the A.O. in examining the issues referred to in the show cause notice. The CIT questioned the issues right from verification of corpus donations to examination of advance given to member of society. As regards corpus .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

onations, a general presumption is drawn that the A.O. has verified all the details and also satisfied with the explanations furnished by the assessee. The CIT cannot presume that the A.O. has not examined the issues unless he points out that the A.O. has not examined the issue. As regards the applicability of maximum marginal rate of tax is concerned, the CIT was of the opinion that the A.O. ought to have applied maximum marginal rate of tax to the income of the society. But, the fact is that o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

able to the assessee is maximum marginal rate of tax without understanding the provisions. 14. Similarly, as regards the advance given to Gopisetty Mallaiah & Co., the assessee vide its letter dated 24.3.2014 given details of advance given to Gopisetty Mallaiah & Co. and explained the purpose for which the advance is given. The assessee explained that it has given advance for the purpose of construction of old age home on the site belonging to the assessee. The A.O. after satisfied with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ns does not arise. In the present case on hand, on perusal of the facts available on record, we find that the A.O. has examined all the issues i.e. corpus donations, applicability of maximum marginal rate of tax and advance given to Gopisetty Mallaiah & Co., except the issue with regard to difference in income from house property of ₹ 52,717/-. In respect of difference in income from house property of ₹ 52,717/-, the assessee himself has admitted that he has no explanations to of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ughly examined by the A.O. at the time of assessment, therefore, the CIT was not correct in coming to the conclusion that the A.O. has not examined the issues before completion of assessment. 15. The CIT, has power to revise the assessment order u/s 263 of the Act, but to invoke the provisions of section 263 of the Act, the twin conditions must be satisfied i.e. (1) the order of the CIT is erroneous (2) further it must be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Unless both the conditions are .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itions i.e. the order is erroneous and the same is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue are co-exist. In the present case on hand, on perusal of the facts available on record, we find that the A.O. has conducted detailed enquiry and also examined the issues pointed out by the CIT in his show cause notice. The assessee explained each and every issue pointed out by the CIT with necessary evidences. The CIT cannot assume jurisdiction to revise the assessment order, once assessee explained tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

essee. The assessee relied upon the decision of coordinate bench of Visakhapatnam Tribunal, in the case of Shri Sai Contractors Vs. CIT, in ITA No.109/Vizag/2012 dated 30.9.2015. The coordinate bench of this Tribunal, under similar circumstances held that once the A.O. examined the issues on which the CIT wants further verification, the CIT cannot assume jurisdiction on the same issues which was already examined by the A.O. at the time of assessment, by stating that the A.O. has conducted inadeq .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

enue is also erroneous. Unless the A.O s order is not erroneous, no action can be taken by the CIT u/s 263 of the Act, this is because the twin conditions i.e. (1) the order is erroneous and (2) the same is also prejudicial to the interest of the revenue are not coexists. In the present case, the A.O. has conducted enquiry before allowing deduction towards wages and centering expenses and also examined the points on which the CIT wants further verification. The assessing officer after carefully .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

itself give occasion to the CIT to assume jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act, merely because he has a different opinion in the matter. The CIT can do this only, when there is a lack of enquiry by the assessing officer. In the present case, the assessment order is detailed one and also, the A.O. has passed a remarks in the assessment order on two issues, on which the CIT assumed jurisdiction, i.e. disallowance of round some expenditure of ₹ 1,00,000/- under the head wages and centering charge .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

had not been disputed by the revenue. The Commissioner cannot initiate revision proceedings, with a view to conduct fishing and revolving enquiry in the matters which are already examined by the A.O. The Department cannot do fresh assessment in the guise of revision on the matters which are examined and concluded by the A.O. The A.O. being a Quasi Judicial authority, shall have the authority to exercise right judgement and discretion on the basis of information available before him. In the pres .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

dinate bench of this Tribunal, under similar facts held as under: 11. The CIT has power of revising the assessment order u/s 263 of the Act, but, to invoke the provisions of section 263 of the Act, the twin conditions must be satisfied i.e. the order of the A.O. is erroneous and further it must be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. Unless both the conditions are satisfied, the CIT cannot assume jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act. It is not necessary that every order which is erroneous must .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r issues pointed out by the A.O. The assessee explained that though filing of audit report in form no.10CCB is mandatory in nature, it is not necessary to file the same along with return of income in view of the changes in filing of income tax return from paper return to e-filing of income tax returns. In the new system of e-filing of income tax returns, filing of physical copy of any reports or statements is done away with. Similarly, as regards the eligibility of job work charges for claiming .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Forum: Duty Drawback- Urgent

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Forum: GST Invoice

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.

News: GST implementation smoother than expected: Jaitley

Forum: GST - TRAN1 - filed - Data uploaded with Remarks Processed with Error - Not coming in Electronic credit ledger - need suggession guidance

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Due date of Filing TRAN-1

Highlight: Diversion of income at source - Joint venture agreement - 97% of the receipt transfer to M/s TRG Industries (P) Ltd. - scope of the agreement - it is diversion by overriding title - not taxable in the hands of assessee - HC

Highlight: Expenditure on eligible projects or schemes u/s 35AC - After 01.04.2017 the legislature desired to withdraw such deduction. - The Union legislature was competent to introduce such amendment - HC

Highlight: Transfer of trading assets at cost price, the profit component also stood transferred to the outgoing Directors, which otherwise belonged to the Company - the fact that AO has made the addition in the hands of the Directors would not make any difference - additions confirmed - HC

Highlight: The interest u/s 234B of the Act cannot go beyond the stage of S.245D(I) before the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Galvanized iron pipe is a different commercial commodity than a iron pipe, therefore the activity of galvanization in our considered opinion amounts to manufacture - Deduction u/s 80-IB allowed - HC

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271C - non deduction of TDS on interest paid to sister concerns in terms of Section 194A - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

Highlight: Disallowance of interest - reference to section 179 - The legislature has also recognised, that the doctrine of lifting of veil in the matter of tax dues is to be applied to prevent fraud etc. and not where the company has suffered despite its normal bona fide function. - HC

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Notification: Amendment in Notification No. S.O. 3118(E), dated the 3rd October, 2016

Highlight: Discount on ESOP to be allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1), during the years of vesting on the basis of percentage of vesting during such period, subject to upward or downward adjustment at the time of exercise of option.

Notification: Central Government appoints the 20th September, 2017 as the date on which proviso to clause (87) of section 2 of the Companies Act 2013, shall come into force

Notification: Companies (Restriction on number of layers) Rules, 2017

Highlight: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - additional income disclosure - surrender of income post survey u/s 133A - he disclosure made by the assessee is voluntary in nature, in the revised return - no penalty

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - notice u/s 148 issued on the directions of JCIT / CIT - a perusal of reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings clearly show that they are against the sprit of provisions u/s 147

Highlight: MAT - Adjustment to book profit - computation u/clause (f) of Explanation-1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D of I.T. Rules.

Highlight: Addition on account of alleged suppression of service value received - the addition made simply believing the Form 26AS will be an arbitrary exercise of power which cannot be sustained

Notification: Exempts intra state supply of heavy water and nuclear fuels from DAE to NPCIL

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 12/2017-UTT(R) to exempt right to admission to the events organised under FIFA U-17 World Cup 2017

Notification: Seeks to amend notification No. 11/2017- UTT(R) to reduce CGST rate on specified supplies of Works Contract Services

Highlight: Liability to pay duty on import of software - Though no authorization was given by the appellant to DHL, it is an undisputed position that the software has, in fact, been ordered by the appellant and have been delivered to them by DHL - the appellant is to be considered as the importer



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version