2016 (11) TMI 155

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Appellant : Shri R. C. Sexena, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Sameer Chitkara, Authorised Representative ORDER Per Dr. D. M. Misra These three appeals are filed against respective order-in-originals passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Vadodara-I. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case, during the relevant period, that is, from October 2009 to March 2014, the appellants we .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... duty on the clearance of Gypsum, the Ld. Advocate submits that once Di-Calcium Phosphate manufactured from Rock Phosphate is considered as not chargeable to duty, its clearance value would being below the SSI exemption limit, and accordingly no duty would be required to be paid on the said by-product. 4. Ld. AR for the Revenue has not disputed the issuance of said Notification under Section 11C, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... earing be granted to the appellant. 5. At this stage, the Ld. Advocate submits that substantial amount has been deposited by them, therefore, a timeframe may be fixed for disposal of the cases. The Ld. AR has no objection. Accordingly, it is directed that the cases be decided as far as practicable within three months from the date of communication of this order. . 6. All these appeals are allowe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X