9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 925X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... respondent Per: D.N. Panda This matter was heard yesterday. Ld. Counsel's argument was that the amount already deposited against the demand raised by Revenue by the impugned order do not call for any further amount to be paid. This was their consistent pleading before the authorities below from 30.06.2003, praying for verification of the deposit particulars. 2. In view of above pleadings Revenu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , Trichy. Vide this order, the appellate Commissioner upheld the order of the adjudicating authority and confirmed the following:- a. Duty payable on captively consumed flexible plain sheets of plastics from May 1994 to 15.03.1995 - Rs. 60,78,328/- was determined b. Cenvat credit of duty paid on inputs such as PVC resin - Rs. 6,76,748/- denied c. Duty on flexible plain plastic sheets due to dif ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... own in the SCNs. (vi) Appellant had paid Rs. 3,00,000/- by way of pre-deposit in appeal No. E/1421/2004 which also arose out of a similar order in their own case on the same issue. They have deposited balance amount of Rs. 23,22,862/- as directed by the Tribunal in that stay order. Compliance was noted and extension of stay was granted vide miscellaneous orders No. 454 and 455/2006 dated 20.09.20 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... been any discrepancy noticed by Revenue at the interim stage itself, they would have come out to report before the Tribunal to protect their interest if prejudiced. But that has not been done. Therefore, their interest has not been affected. Even till today, the stay order passed by the Tribunal has not been challenged by Revenue before any higher Court nor that has been stayed. Therefore, the fa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
