Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (7) TMI 1173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ate, Kolkata-II, investigated the matter of issuance of fake invoices by the fraudulent dealer M/s M.K. Steels, whereby he facilitated availment of illegal Cenvat credit by the manufacturers. On the basis of Circular dated 22.06.06 issued by the Commissioner of Central Excise-Kolkata-II, the Jurisdictional Central Excise Authorities at Lucknow investigated the matter at the factory of the respondent and initiated proceedings on the ground that wrong Cenvat credit has been taken based on the fraudulent invoices issued by the supplier of goods. Service tax demand confirmed and penalty imposed in the adjudication order was set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals), holding that the goods covered under the disputed invoices were received by the r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat upon proper analysis of the documents submitted by the Respondent, since the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has arrived at the conclusion that the appellant (respondent herein) had in fact received the goods covered under the disputed invoices, maintainability of the impugned order cannot be questioned at this juncture, especially in view of the fact that the Revenue has not brought on any tangible evidence to prove non-receipt of the goods by the respondent. Further, I find that in an identical set of facts, involving the same supplier M/s M K Steel (P) Ltd., the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s Juhi Alloys (Supra) have dismissed the appeal filed by the Department, holding that once the goods have been received by the recipi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tors Ltd. - 2013 (294) E.L.T. 394 (Jhar.), where it was held as follows :- "... Once a buyer of inputs receives invoices of excisable items, unless factually it is established to the contrary, it will be presumed that when payments have been made in respect of those inputs on the basis of invoices, the buyer is entitled to assume that the excise duty has been/will be paid by the supplier on the excisable inputs. The buyer will be therefore entitled to claim Modvat credit on the said assumption. It would be most unreasonable and unrealistic to expect the buyer of such inputs to go and verify the accounts of the supplier or to find out from the department of Central Excise whether actually duty has been paid on the inputs by the supplier. No .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates