2016 (12) TMI 703

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri Rabeen Jayaram, Advocate  For the Appellant Shri B. Balamurugan, AC (AR) For the Respondent ORDER C/236/2005 Both the authorities have not allowed the benefit of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. dt. 1.3.2002 in respect of goods specified in List 43 at Sl.No.401 (Condition No.87) of the Table for setting up of any Nuclear Power Project. 2.  It is the submission of the appellant th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it of the notification. The notification in so far as that is relevant for adjudication of the case is reproduced as under :- Table S.No. Chapter or Heading No. or sub-heading   No. Description of goods Standard rate Additional duty rate Condition No. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) ... ... ... ... ... ... 401 98.01 Goods required for setting up of any Nuclear Power Project .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l as the capacity is to be certified by a specified officer  of Govt. of India which is also not disputed.  Appellant says that the goods imported was within the knowledge of the nuclear project authority.  They were the essential party to the import since their name appears in the Bills of Entry also. He demonstrates from page 51 of the appeal folder that the goods were imported on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X