1988 (9) TMI 355

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... wing a deduction of ₹ 10,221 representing travelling expenses and ₹ 17,245 representing expenditure on law costs and stamps in respect of a defunct business in the computation of the total income of the assessee ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal as justified in holding that the expenses of ₹ 10,221 on travelling and of ₹ 17,245 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... -tax Officer?" 2. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the expenses as mentioned in question Nos. 1 and 2, were incurred for the purposes of protecting the company's assets. The Tribunal upheld the finding of the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal further held that the amounts in question were spent in the business interest of the assessee and were deductible in the computation of its .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the same group were sent to the bank for realisation. The sending of the three dividend warrants of the Bank would not involve any expenditure. On this fact, the Tribunal upheld the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) deleting the expenditure deducted by the ITO to determine the dividend income for the purpose of allowance of relief under section 80M of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 5. In our view, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X