2017 (1) TMI 432

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. AKP/NSK/56/2011 dated 15.03.2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Nasik. 2. None appeared for the appellant despite notice. Since the matter is of 2011, we take up the same for disposal. 3. Heard the learned Departmental Representative and perused the records. 4. The issue that falls for consideration is whether t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ties. In our considered opinion, the impugned order is correct to the extent, it confirms the demand of Service Tax liability and the interest thereof under the category of "Business Auxiliary Services" as there is no dispute to the fact that appellant had paid amounts to various service providers for promotional activity of their product. In view of the above, we confirm the demand raised of Serv .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X