Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1972 (9) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and remand the case back to that court for deciding the appeal afresh - C.A. 1772 OF 1969 - - - Dated:- 22-9-1972 - Judge(s) : I. D. DUA., K. S. HEGDE., P. JAGANMOHAN REDDY. and H. R. KHANNA. JUDGMENT The judgment of the court was delivered by HEGDE J.--- This is an original petitioner's appeal by certificate. It arises from a decision of a Division Bench of the Allahabad .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Aggrieved by that order the appellant went up in appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner rejected the appeal on the ground that the same was not maintainable. He took the view that an appeal lay only under section 30(1A). But, before such an appeal can be entertained the appellant must satisfy two conditions, namely, (1) he had deducted the tax due f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the learned single judge to the Appellate Bench. That Bench allowed the appeal with the observations, in the present case the question before the Income-tax Officer, Rampur, was whether the firm Nathirmal and Sons was non-resident or not. There was material before him on this question. He had jurisdiction to decide the question either way. It cannot be said that the officer assumed jurisdiction .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the assessee was entitled for the writ of certiorari prayed for by him. It is incomprehensible to think that a quasi-judicial authority like the Income-tax Officer can erroneously decide a jurisdictional fact and thereafter proceed to impose a levy on a citizen. In our opinion, the Appellate Bench is wholly wrong in opining that the Income-tax Officer can decide either way . It was contende .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... right in his contention, then he could not have deducted the tax due from the firm to whom he made the payment. For the reasons mentioned above, we allow this appeal, set aside the order of the Appellate Bench of the Allahabad High Court and remand the case back to that court for deciding the appeal afresh. It is open to the assessee to urge all the points that he has taken in the case. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates