Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1973 (12) TMI 1

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rt compass, are these: In the year 1820 one Smt. Chitra Dassi executed an ekrarnama making a gift of a piece of land for religious purposes. In 1842 she executed a will referring to the fact that she had earlier made the property debutter and directed her four sons, the executors, to perform the daily service of Sri Radhagobindjee. She died in 1855. In 1876 a suit was filed in the Calcutta High Court praying that the trust should be administered by the court and a scheme prepared. Subsequently, there were a number of applications made from time to time and a number of orders were also made on them. In 1929 a scheme of administration was framed and a little later the official trustee of Bengal was appointed to be the trustee of the said debu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sense, that is to say, as understood in the English law. In respect of the first part of the second question both parties before the High Court agreed that in that question the word " trust " did not mean a trust in the technical or the English sense. The High Court pointed out that it has been held that a dedication is a trust in the general sense within the meaning of t he expression as used in sections 4, 40 and 41 of the Income-tax Act and the word " trust " can be applied to Hindu endowments. On the second, part of the question it was held that the endowment is a private religious trust and the documents creating it or confirming it grant no benefit to the members of the public, that an order made by the Calcutta High Court by which ce .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... gious services of the idol. The rents constituted, therefore, in legal contemplation, its property. The sebait had not the legal property, but only the title of manager of a religious endowment. In Prosunno Kumari Debya v. Golab Chand Baboo , the above observations were cited with approval. In Manobar Ganesh Tambekar v. Lakhmiram Govinndram, a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court observed: " The Hindu law, like the Roman law and those derived from it, recognises, not only corporate bodies with rights of property vested in the corporation apart from its individual members, but also the juridical persons or subjects called foundations ....... It is consistent with the grants having been made to the juridical person symbolized or person .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ust mean human being, because it is used as something distinct from a joint family, firm and company. The whole expression seems to me to mean ' every human being, Hindu undivided family, company, firm and other association of human beings." Though in consequence of this decision the Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1939, amended the words de association of individuals " into " association of persons ", the word " individual ", being first of the six assessable units. mentioned in section 3, was retained and was not amended into " person ". It could not be changed into " person " for the obvious reason that the word " person " is of wider import and includes any company or association or body of individuals, whether incorporated or not. So a w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... income should be held to be outside the ambit of taxation if it can be brought within it without straining the language of the statutory provision. It would naturally be taxed through its shebaits who are in possession and management of its property. We may, however, mention that the problem whether the Hindu deity is an individual is not likely to arise after the enactment of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which in clause (31) of section 2 defines a " person " as including: (i) an individual, (ii) a Hindu undivided family, (iii) a company, (iv) a firm, (v) an association of persons or a body of individuals, whether incorporated or not, (vi) a local authority, and (vii) every artificial juridical person, not falling within any of the preceding s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates